Experimenting with Magnetic Loop Antennas
2019-12-10 Well, after playing with magnetic loops for quite a while and especially the past couple of weeks, I have some observations.
- First, they are not magical or complicated. They are very very simple, nothing more than a large main loop, resonated at the operating frequency with a variable capacitor connected to the two ends of the loop. There are various ways to connect it to your radio but one of the simplest ways to do that is a second loop (driven loop) with a circumference of approximately 1/5th that of the main loop. The deiven loop is placed near the main loop, usually at either the top or the bottom, opposite of the capacitor. That's it.
- The variable capacitor needs to meet three primary criteria. a) be of a capacitance that it can resonate your main loop at the frequency you desire. With a one-meter loop a tuning range of about 10pf to 200pf will be about right for 40-20 meters. b) be able to handle the high voltage that will be across it at resonance. I standard broadcast receiver type capacitor will work for power levels around 20 watts or less. c) offer the lowest conductive resistance possible to the loop to minimize losses. A typical way of handling that is to use a two ganged variable capacitor with one end of the main loop connected to one of the stators and the other to the other stator. The rotor then then "floats" electrically between the two capacitively coupling them. The result is no moving connections to get dirty and offer erratic or high resistance connections.
- Main loop diameter is important but not super critical to the performance. Typical loop diameters range from about 3 feet to maybe 4-1/2 feet. That is large enough to perform reasonably well from 40 meters up through 20 meters. But its not so large as to be unwieldy! You'll have to balance the diameter with the capacitance of the capacitor to get the tuning range you want. Larger is generally better to a point but is related to operating frequency. Check out this link for a simple calculator. http://www.66pacific.com/calculators/small-transmitting-loop-antenna-calculator.aspx.
- Main loop material. The primary concerns as far as what to use for the material for the main loop are loss and surface area. Both will be affected by the conductivity and cross section of the material. A larger cross section is generally better. Many loops you buy or that people make use RG8 or similar coax. Pay particular attention to the connectors as the connections between the loop and the capacitor are main resistance points. But don't be put off by that. I have used standard PL259 and SO239 connectors as have many others. Copper or aluminum is preferable to steel but both work.
- The driven loop circumference should be approximately 1/5th the circumference of the main loop. It's not super critical but deviating too far from that will result in higher SWR at resonance. Diameter of the wire or material from which the driven loop is made is not big concern. #14 or #12 electrical wire will work.
- Have at it! Try something. You can and will improve it as you gain experience! Just have fun with this novel antenna.
2019-12-10 OK, this morning I made a 3 ft diameter driven loop out of #14 electrical wire for the 1.4 meter diameter main loop. That solved the SWR problem. Now it is below 1.1:1 on 40, 30 and 20 meters. Question answered! Also if I plug my coax capacitor across the main tuning capacitor it will tune the whole 40 meter band! It even gives me a 1.6:1 SWR on 5.405 Mhz! I sort of hate to admit it, but this is fun!
SWR traces of a 1.4 meter magnetic loop for 40, 30 and 20 meters with an 11 inch driven loop.
2019-12-08 One of the responses on Facebook suggested a 1.5 or even 1.7 meter diameter loop for 40 meters. I was just about to cut a piece of RG8 coax to that length when I discovered I had a 4.3 meter (14 ft) length with connectors hanging on a peg in my garage! That would result in a 1.4 meter diameter loop, so I did a quick modification to the center pole allowing me to mount the capacitor box lower and thus accommodate the larger loop! Then I quickly checked to see if it would tune. Low and behold, it does, with just the 10-120pf variable capacitor it will tune from 7.100 mhz to 14.250 mhz. However the SWR is not as good as with the 1 meter loop! I'm wondering whether that is related to the size of the driven loop? At 1/5th the circumference of the large loop it should be 0.8 meters or 2' 10" circumference or 1' 5" diameter. It is now about six inch diameter. Always something to play with!
After writing the above I put the 1 meter loop back on the capacitor. One problem with the larger loop is that indoors it simply takes up too much space and is very difficult to rotate. Also, it won't quite tune down to the CW portion of the 40 meter band so requires I make another capacitor to put across the variable. I may at some point make a larger driving loop and play with the 1.4 meter one again but for now I want to just go back to what I know works well.
SWR traces of the one meter magnetic loop for 40, 30 and 20 meters with a 60-1/2 inch driven loop.
The three images at right show the SWR curves on the 1 meter loop for the three bands. One question I have shows up on the 20 meter trace where there is one "up-peak" on the left of the resonant frequency and two above that frequency. What are those?
2019-12-08 When I posted the latest version of the loop and the success I've had with it the past few days on Facebook a couple people raised concerns about possible negative health impact being so close to me while operating. Not sure how valid those concerns might be or exactly what one might do about that. Without a remotely tuned capacitor it has to be close enough to tune it to resonance on the desired frequency. I note that most of those you purchase have the same potential problem. Interesting issue.
Left: 1 meter loop. Right 1.4 meter loop.
2019-12-07 If you follow my activities at all you'll realize that for some strange reason I am "into" antennas. I'm constantly thinking about them, building them, buying them and putting them up and taking them down! I'm far from an expert but am gaining experience and maybe even knowledge about them. My article comparing various wire antennas is probably controversial but is how I'm thinking about them at the moment.
One that constantly messes with my mind is the magnetic loop. So yesterday I set it up and connected it to my antenna switch which allows me to quickly change antennas and rigs.
After the initial tune up for peak noise and running the obligatory SWR sweep on both my G90 and X5105, I cheated and tuned around 40 meters using my EFHW antenna. The band wasn't very exciting but suddenly K40Y popped up at 7.054 Mhz, just ending a QSO. He was 599+ on the EFHW. Switching quickly to the mag loop, peaking it and rotating it for strongest signal he was 579 to 589 on it. So I called him running 20 watts! That satisfied my short term craving so I disconnected and put it back in its place in my closet!
I was all excited when he came back until he gave my signal report, 339! I noticed that I my SWR was pretty high so I carefully peaked it for maximum power as indicated by me Field Strength Meter. He didn't comment but we completed the QSO with no trouble so he clearly heard me - hopefully better!
Then this morning, as I was writing this, I decided to give it another go, result? Three more 40 meters QSOs! Two with SKCC callers on CW and one SSB one with the MidCars Net Control on 7.258 Mhz in Indiana, KC9YTC. None were exotic DX but that's OK, it works!
All that to say, never give up on an antenna, particularly one that is somewhat unique. Though I'm convinced the loop doesn't rival the EFHW in performance, it does allow me to have an HF QSO without an outside antenna. That is something the EFHW can't do!
Further, even a compromise antenna can provide amazing results. I've now had a total of 43 QSOs with the mag loop since my first version back on December 18, 2018. Twenty nine of those were at 5 watts. And my current long distance record of 2118 miles with a station in Puerto Rico on 20 meters was at five watts. He gave me a 579!
2019-11-22a Later this evening I decided to mock up the "rectifier" approach I first thought of. The schematic is shown. It works. Better or worse? Not quite sure. I need to play with the values of both the resistor and capacitor and possibly the number of turns in the coil to really decide. Both approaches give a clear indication of peak current and resonance.
2019-11-22 One of the things I love about ham radio is the stimulation to think up and try new things. The picture at right is one of those. I posted to Facebook my comments below about use of a field strength meter to tune or peak my magnetic loop. In response a guy wrote, "I'd like to figure out how Alex does it with an LED on his Alextune."
That got me thinking, why not just wind a wire around the loop, put a diode in series with a capacitor to "ground", with a resistor in series with an LED across the capacitor. The diode and capacitor are a half wave rectifier and the voltage across the capacitor will be directly proportional to the RF current in the loop. The LED will glow brighter or dimmer based on that proportional voltage.
Then it hit me that an LED IS a diode! What would happen with just the coil and led? A short clip lead and old led
removed from something are a "breadboard" implementation of the idea. The exciting part is that it works! In fact it works well. With five watts from my G90 the LED lights with the peak is easy to determine. And the SWR meter on the radio says it is 1:1! Playing with a couple different LED's you may need to adjust the number of turns for different ones.
It can be cleaned up a bit but I think it is a functional concept and is easy to implement. So success! I can go eat breakfast now!
2019-11-19 Had another 40 meter QSO with the loop this evening with W5LNI in Arkansas, 533 miles. He was 579 in here and gave me a 559. Not half way around the world but still exciting! I found the quickest way to fine tune the loop after peaking it for maximum noise is to look at a field strength meter. When it peaks, the SWR will be as close to 1:1 as you can get. That seems easier to me than watching the SWR indicator on the radio. If the field strength meter is any indication of how tuning affects performance, having the antenna tuned "exactly" is really important. The peak is very sharp. I think it is sharper with the coax capacitor than with the ceramic ones I was using earlier.
SWR measurements taken on the magnetic loop following the QSO with W5LNI.
2019-11-17 0315Z Just made my first 40 meter contact with W3IDT (U 57 MDC) after rebuilding the mag loop using the 3' coax as the add on cap and threaded up center of mast. He was operating in the ARRL Sweekstakes. So at least I know it does work! Tuning is challenging. Need a geared down Cap! He didn't give me a signal report but judging by how many times I had to repeat I'm guessing I was about a 44. He was a solid 57 in here from Maryland, just over 600 miles. My loop was standing on the ground floor in my shack surrounded by walls and a 50' hill immediately behind the house in his direction. I'm guessing if I were outside it would make at least some difference. That's one contact each on 20 and 40 meters. Now to strike it rich on 30 meters! I was using a ten foot RG-174 feedline.
2019-11-16 Something got me thinking about my mag loop again the other day. Might have been a post in the mag loop group on Facebook. Anyway I decided to increase the diameter of my loop from it's current 33 inch diameter to one meter (39.4 inch) diameter, which seems to be what most pre-made ones are. The biggest hassle was putting the PL259 connectors on the 10'4" piece of RG-8 coax I cut to length. The connectors were the cheap nickle plated ones which don't solder worth a darn. But I finally got it. I also got a five foot length of 3/4 PVC to handle the larger loop.
I used the 12-123pf capacitor described below that I was using with the shorter loop. It would resonate on 10.15mhz (85pf) and on 14.15mhz (50pf) but not 7.15mhz which needs 175pf. I needed an additional 50pf to resonate on 40. With a bit of experimenting I found by connecting a 3 foot RG58 jumper across the variable capacitor I could resonate 40 meters nicely! I don't know how good of a capacitor an open ended piece of coax makes but the loop seems like it has a high Q with it. So at least temporarily I'm in business. By the way with the coaxial capacitor connected I have a capacitance range of 84pf to 195pf.
I couldn't wait to to give it a try so I tuned up on 20 meters I right away had a QSO with N6AR in Florida, just over 1000 miles south east of my residence in SE Wisconsin. He was 579 in here but was in a contest so was only giving out quick 599's. The loop was on the ground floor of our house surrounded by walls and all sorts of metal and electronic stuff. I know that isn't a very exhaustive or conclusive test, but I'm pleased. When I have more time I'll try more contacts on 20, 30 and 40 meters.
After completing the above it further occurred to me that I could make a cleaner and neater installation of the coax capacitor if I simply cut a 3 foot length of RG8X (which is what I had in bulk) and solder it to the little connector board I had made up instead of using the BNC connector. Then I wondered whether I could stick the "tail" of the piece of coax into the center of the support post. The picture above shows the result. As nearly as I can tell by measuring SWR with the tail hanging down vs. up through the center of the support post there is no difference. I'm sure this isn't my last modification but it's time to stop now!
2019-10-30 A few weeks back, playing with my mag loop I blew the capacitor that I add to the variable capacitor so it'll tune 40 meters by hitting it with too much power! I scrounged around and found a combination of junk box ones that work but decided to order some "proper" ones with high enough voltage rating that I wouldn't have a repeat performance. Well yesterday they came. Turns out they won't work. But the loop still works on 20 meters without the capacitor. Much to my surprise I was able to have a SSB QSO with the YL System operator on 14.332 mhz at 20 watts! He was in Florida. Actually I had two QSOs with him. The first one was using my MFJ EFHW antenna by accident since I failed to throw the switch to the mag loop! He gave me a 55 report. I immediately discovered my mistake, threw the switch and did a recheck using the loop. This time he gave me a 53 report. The band was up and down the whole time so the reports are not definitive. Never mind, it works! I had almost given up and forgotten about it while playing with wire antennas! Oh, and it rebooted one of my computers as well which was right in the radiating path and only a few feet away!
2019-05-20 This past week a friend, KD9KHI, and I attended the Dayton Hamvention. Amazing experience that every ham should attend at least once. Not sure I'll ever go again. We walked miles of flea market tables and booths as well as by nearly every vendor booth. Way too much! But one $6 purchase I made was worth the trip (well not really!). It was what I thought was an MFJ-801 Field Strength Meter. Turns out it was like a lot of my stuff, started out as the MFJ-801 but had been modified by a previous owner. I wasn't happy with the mod that guy did so did my own. Click here if interested in those details.
I mention this here because one of things I have wondered about my magnetic loop is it's radiation pattern and if one could use a field strength meter to tune it. I pretty much knew the answer to both questions but I like to "see" things for myself. So this morning I used my new field strength meter to do some experiments. First the tuning question. Using my Xiegu x5105 with the field strength meter about a yard away from the loop, I tuned, first listening on the receiver for peak noise, then watching the SWR meter on the radio I tweaked it for lowest SWR. As I expected, the field strength meter peaked right at the lowest SWR! Playing around I'm not convinced that using that peak output is as easy for peaking the antenna as the radio SWR meter, but it clearly works. The challenge is that the output curve is very sharp and the meter goes from peak to near zero very quickly. Perhaps increasing the size of the capacitor across the meter might help by slowing down the discharge rate of the capacitor? Not sure.
On the question of peak and null as the antenna is rotated, it appears very distinct using this little field strength meter. I'm sure my meter is not linear so my observation is not quantifiable. But The meter goes from near full scale to almost no movement at all as I rotate the antenna from inline with the meter to broadside to the meter. That does reasonably approximate my observations from listening to signals.
My conclusion is that a cheap and dirty signal strength meter is useful and well worth having in one's bag of tricks, particularly when playing with a magnetic loop antenna.
2019-05-11 A few weeks ago I took my magnetic loop outside and set up everything. but to my dismay, it would not tune on 40 meters. Thirty meters and above worked just fine. What could be wrong? That was the first time I had really tried to use it since inverting it as described below. It was chilly and I didn't want to mess with it so brought it in and stashed it out of the way, perhaps to be forgotten forever. But yesterday I decided to give it another chance.
I wasn't particularly happy with the thing inverted so decided to switch it back to the capacitor on the bottom, thinking that magically that might also cure my 40 meter problem. It didn't. Then it occurred to me that perhaps I had zapped the plug in capacitor which allowed it to tune 40 meters. A quick measurement confirmed that the capacitor was blown. Maybe there is something to that high voltage stuff! Bottom line, it's working again with a new capacitor. Actually the capacitor now consists of two 270pf capacitors in series, having the voltage across each.
2019-04-15 Yesterday in a Facebook Group focused on magnetic loops I read a discussion of where the capacitor and driven loop should be located on the main loop. Specifically should the capacitor be at the top or bottom and should the driven loop be opposite that. The "expert" in the discussion who apparently has been involved in commercial design of small magnetic loops argued, convincingly I might add, that the capacitor should be at the top and the driving loop at the bottom. Why, well the extremely high voltage across the capacitor should be as far from surrounding metal things as possible, including the coax that connects to the driven loop. Since most magnetic loop supports are metal and if the driven loop is at the top the coax usually drops right past the capacitor those two things reduce the effectiveness of the loop. He went so far as to say something like that such an arrangement significantly interferes with the loops performance and much of the "good" people attribute to it is likely from feedline radiation.
Whether he is right or wrong and if right just how significant that is I can't evaluate. But the design of my loop is such that it was very easy to flip-flop it, so I did. The left photo below show the rebuilt loop with the capacitor at the top and the driven loop at the bottom. Everything else is exactly the same as before. The other two photos show the SWR curve of the rebuilt loop on 40 and 20 meters respectively. I haven't had any QSOs with it and the band had almost no signals on it when I finished so I haven't' done any real evaluation of it beyond the SWR checks. The only two disadvantages I see with this new configuration are that it is now a bit top heavy and you have to stand up to tune it! Life is just filled with difficulties! :-)
2019-02-22 Today my rebuilt magnetic loop made it outside for the first time. Winter here in southeast Wisconsin has been close to brutal this year with temperatures dipping to minus 25f and wind chills down to around minus 65. And snow... We've had something approaching 40 inches so far! And some of that mixed with freezing rain and ice. Being outdoors was something to be minimized, certainly not played in by guys like me. So today's bright sun and temperature of plus 38 degrees inspired me to take my magnetic loop, Xiegu x5105 and straight key out and set up in the driveway and enjoy the warm sun while trying to make a contact or two.
The result? Well, not a suntan! But I did have one good 5 watt CW QSO with W5MIG 1040 miles southwest in Texas on 20 meters! I heard and called a number of other stations on 20, 30 and 40 meters but couldn't raise them. Very few were strong and the QSB was pretty bad even with the strong ones. But I was happy! With QRP one decides ahead of time to be happy with the results... to savor each contact.
I'm not sure if it was the antenna or what, but the atmospheric and other noise levels were very low on all of the bands. I think getting away from the house may have made a difference.
The low band noise also highlighted the antenna's rather narrow radiation pattern. It was obvious when you were pointing right at the transmitting station.
At the same time the low band noise made it a bit difficult to find the resonant point because there was little noise to peak when the antenna was tuned. On 30 meters I had to resort to decreasing the transmitter power to minimum and holding the key down while tuning the capacitor to even find the resonant point.
Even though I only had one QSO it was really fun to set up pretty much like I might in some more remote portable situation. I was surrounded by all the modern amenities but not connecrted to nor using them for that hour or so! That's portable isn't it?!
2019-02-17 I think I've actually completed the rebuild, including the jacks to plug in the 40 meter tuning capacitor and a cover for the electrical box. I made on e 40 meter QSO with it this afternoon during the DX contest with a CJ3A Islington Ontario, 473 miles north east of here. He was 589 and gave me a 559. I was once again doing CW with my x5105 at 5 watts.
2019-02-15 Well, I've finished the rebuild of my magnetic loop. The good news is that it still works. The bad news is that I can't tell if it works any better than before! The Q may be just a bit higher but I can't be positive. I'll play with it over the next few days and see whether in use I feel like it works any differently.
My objective was two fold. 1) to try to reduce losses due to connections to the capacitor. 2) to clean up the build somewhat by replacing my home brew wooden box housing the capacitor with an electrical box. On point 2 I was successful. Whether it looks or works any better is open to debate. Temporarily (I hope) I've lost 40 meters as I haven't remounted the connectors for plugging in the additional fixed capacitor needed for that. On point one, if indeed the Q is a bit higher then that too was successful.
I made the connections between the SO230 jacks to the capacitor with copper strap with all connections screwed and soldered. I connected only the shield of the radiating loop to the capacitor. I may make a connection to the center conductor also, we'll see.
2019-02-14 As you can tell from my comments below I am impressed with my magnetic loop. But as I've continued to read and watch YouTube videos about magnetic loops I'm concerned about the quality of the connections I have made between the loop and capacitor. So last night I decided to disassemble it and try to make those connections more robust and hopefully less lossy in hopes that the performance of the loop will improve even more!
2019-02-08 Two days ago I set up my Wolf River Coils Silver Bullet 1000 TIA antenna outside on our sidewalk. It was cold and the sidewalk was icy as we had an ice storm overnight. I was overjoyed to have three good QSOs. one each on 20, 30 and 40 meters. Click here to see all about that. That antenna is my latest addition so it has gotten moist of the attention the past week or so. I tuned up on 7.258, the MidCars frequency and listened. At first it was discouraging. I could just barely detect anyone, including the net control.
But today it was zero F when I awoke and it is only ten now with strong winds, brutal! I had a nice 40 meter CW QSO about 7:30 this morning with a station in NC. I was running 25 watts and using my G5RV. But about 11:30 I decided to break out the mag loop and try a QSO.
Then he handed net control over to W0UZR up in Minnesota. Steve was a solid 57 and when he asked for mobiles I chimed in. He recognized my call as I check into MidCars from time to time. We only talked a couple minutes but he heard me and was amazed that I was running five watts using a loop. Another successful SSB QSO for the Mag Loop!
I love this antenna. Unfortunately I love ALL my antennas! I also love QRP. It is addicting! Now I want to brave the elements and set up the Silver bullet again!
2019-01-22 The past few weeks I've been playing ham radio with my new IC-7100 doing CW, SSB and this last weekend D-STAR, which I've only had set up for a few days now. My mag loop sort of took a back seat as I enjoyed HF at 25 watts and my G5RV and then D-STAR. But then yesterday D-STAR "broke down", some system problem I think.
I looked over at my loop and X5105 QRP rig and CW straight key and decided it was time to "go back home!" The result? A 40 meter QSO last evening with a station in Maryland and another one with a station in Ohio this morning. Still can hardly believe this 3 foot loop, sitting atop my camera tripod just a few feet from my radio works so well, especially on 40 meters! Basic, simple "radio" is still exciting!
2019-01-06 If you are looking for "the worlds best antenna", this is NOT it! If you are going to build it I think it should be because you are curious and like to try new things. NOT to solve all your antenna problems. A simple dipole or G5RV with tuner will work much better. Having said that, I am constantly being amazed by it, like this morning (2019-01-08). I set it up in the living room because it is a fairly large open space in our house. I connected my Xiegu x5105 five-watt rig and tuned it and the antenna to 7.258, the MidCars net frequency. Rotating it around on my tripod I found the strongest signal point for the net control, N8TUW 360 miles southeast in Ohio. He was coming in at about 57. When He called for mobiles I chimed in ending my call with QRP. He came back immediately, giving me a 55! Just to be sure I did a recheck about a half hour later with the same results! And that was SSB, mind you. It was like making my first contact with my new Novice license sixty years ago. THAT's the mystique of this and many other "compromise" antennas. So if it interests you, go for it. You'll enjoy building and using it.
My wife and I have a running joke in the kitchen. She says I like to putz. I like recipes that require some fiddling around, mixing, heating, stirring things in various orders and are usually not what my mother would have made. When I see something that I haven't tried in the grocery store, I tend to want to see what it can be used for. She, on the other hand, likes to put a chicken or roast in the slow cooker, pour a can of mushroom soup or packet of onion soup mix over it, maybe add some chopped onions, carrots and potatoes, and go do something else. I have to admit that her meals are always good and remind me of what Mother DID make! So no complaint from me. But I like to putz in the kitchen. And I'm always a bit amazed when we eat my concoctions if either of us says, "You know, it's not bad!"
Building this antenna is for putzers! Someone who likes to taste test something unusual and doesn't mind fiddling with wires and connectors and the like to find out. And with this one, when you are done, which you never are, I think, after a few bites you'll say, "You know, this not bad!" But you'll likely go back to slow cooker chicken with mushroom soup for the next meal! So, be advised....
2019-01-02 With nine QSOs over the past 16 days on this antenna using 5 watts, four on 40 meters, including one SSB contact, three on 30 meters and two on 20 meters, I'm convinced that this is a viable antenna. Here is a summary of the details of the construction.
Usable on all HF bands between 40 and 10 meters. Maximum driving power is undetermined but works well for 5 watts.
Main Loop: 106" in circumference (about 3' diameter). Made of Low loss RG-8 sized coax with center conductor and shield tied together on both ends on the SO-239 UHF jacks.
Drive (small) Loop: 21" in circumference (about 8" diameter). RG-8x with the center conductor and shield soldered together at both ends so it is essentially a single of wire. Connects to a BNC jack (for the feedline), one end to the center the other end to the outer or ground side of the jack.
Capacitor: Old am radio tuning capacitor with a range of 8pf to 118pf which tunes the loop from 30 meters to 10 meters.
A 158pf fixed capacitor is paralleled to tune 40 meters. The two sections of the capacitor are connected in series to get the right capacitance. I did this by connecting one of the SO-239's to one stater and the other SO-239 to the other stater. The movable rotor capacitively couples between the two. In addition to getting the range that I wanted it avoids any wiper or movable contacts from the RF current loop reducing losses and making tuning smooth.
Feed-Line: I used a 25 ft length of RG-174 for the feed-line to keep things light weight.
2019-01-01 Ok, I declare that this antenna is for real! Just had a second 40 meter, QRP CW QSO with it using my x5105. That makes two on 40, three on 30, and two on 20, all CW at 5 watts using the x5105. And all in my ground level shack. And band conditions were poor for all of them. Simply fun!
2018-12-31 It's 11:59 am and I just finished a QSO with VA3SZ in London, Ontario on 7.033 using 5 watts and the Mag Loop antenna with the hay-wired capacitors to put it on 40! Zen gave me a 559 and he started at 559 here but actually rose to near 599. I guess I shouldn't be surprised but I am. The calculator above says the antenna is about 1% efficient on 40 meters which means not much signal is getting off the antenna. It is sitting on my ground floor shack on a camera tripod with the bottom of the loop 40 inches off the floor! I've now had one QSO each on 20, 30 and 40 meters. I'm becoming a believer!
2018-12-27 I have been thinking about two improvements to this antenna for several days: 1) getting it to work on 40 meters, 2) finding a larger tuning knob. Well I have at least a temporary solution for both today.
The simplest one was the knob. Tossing around among my junk my eye caught a pack of self-sticking felt furniture pads to protect a hardwood floor from being scratched by moving furniture. I stuck two 2-inch ones together then stuck the pair on the face of the smaller knob I was already using. Works very nicely! It even feels good. And doesn't look terrible. I put some talcum powder on sticky face that the knob doesn't cover to it doesn't even stick to your fingers!
The capacitor was a bit more involved. I wanted to use banana jacks and plugs, but didn't have any. However I did find in one of my junk drawers two pairs of plug-jack things normally used in wiring. I think they will work in the short term.
My second issue was that I couldn't find an appropriately sized capacitor! But by soldering a couple capacitors in parallel I came up with about 140pf which allows my variable to tune the entire 40 meter band nicely. Haven't had a QSO with it but did hear a few weak signals on the band which gives me hope! The SWR curve is much sharper than when I was using a different capacitor shown below.
2018-12-24 A good Christmas eve day activity seemed like it might be to measure signal strength from the loop! So I set it up in a pretty open part of the house, about 8' from the island in our kitchen. I put the field strength meter (FSM) on the island and my x5105 on the corner of the dining room table next to the antenna which was on my camera tripod. Then I hay-wired my CW key so it would stay closed, reduced the power to a half watt and transmitted away, first on 30 meters, then on 20 meters and finally on 17 meters. Results were quite similar on all three bands so I didn't go further. Now think of the right side of the loop (looking at the photo below) on a clock dial as 12 o'clock, and the left side as 6 o'clock and you'll perhaps understand what I'm trying to explain!
On 30 meters, with the 12 o'clock edge pointed at the FSM it read 435mv. With the 3 o'clock edge toward the FSM it read 164mv. With the 6 o'clock broadside toward the FSM it read 387mv and with the 9 o'clock broadside toward the FSM it read 190mv. So Its front and back signal strengths are approximately the same which are about twice as strong as the broadside readings. The numbers on 20 meters were similar in direction but the front signal was about ten times as strong as the broadside. The 17 meter comparison was the same in terms of direction but the ratio of front to side was about 3 to 1. So the antenna is clearly directional, at eight feet anyway!
2018-12-23 After just a few relatively minor changes to the antenna this afternoon, none of them having to do with it's performance but rather its ruggedness and appearance I tuned around on the the 30 meter band and heard W5ZR at 10.119mhz in QSO with a station in Michigan. His signal was an almost steady 579 so I peaked the antenna at that frequency to a 1:1 SWR. Then I rotated the antenna to find the peak at 599.
When he finished I gave him a call using 5 watts with my X5105. He came back and gave me a 579 with some QSB. We had a ten minute or so QSO, he running 200 watts to 2 element quad, so he gets some of the credit!
Note: the center conductor and shield are soldered together at both ends of both the main loop and the small drive loop.
But no matter, the loop antenna works. That makes three QSOs with it, the other two on 20 meters while it was still in a rather makeshift condition. It's nice to know that it works on 30 meters, which is below its "optimum" given the loop circumference of 109 inches including the capacitor. Oh, by the way, the antenna, as pictured above just after the QSO, was only about four feet off the floor of my ground floor ham shack/office! Thanks, Bert for the QSO.
I have to say that I was surprised by the contact today. In spite of the testimony of others, I really have had rather low expectations for this thing. I tackled the project more to understand small loops than to actually use. I'm sure it is not "the best" antenna one can use but it has proven to me that it really is a useful one. To minimize hand capacitance I attached a short plastic shaft extension with a plastic knob. That appears to have completely solved that problem. and the rate of tuning is not too difficult to deal with.
2018-12-22a Another day spent on this crazy antenna. I decided to replace the capacitor with a two stage one that has nearly the same tuning range but there are no movable connections in the RF current path of the main loop. That's because one end of the main loop goes to one of the two sets of fixed plates and the other end of the main loop goes to the other set of fixed plates. The rotating plates which are connected to the shaft have the effect of connecting the two fixed plate sets in series electrically. But the signal never goes through any moving contact or wiper. The capacitor is from an old AM radio that I scrapped some years ago and has fairly wide plate separation. Further since the two variable capacitors are in series, the voltage is divided between them, albeit not evenly since the two sets of plates are of different capacitance values. The capacitor also has a large pulley which makes tuning it simpler. And there is less hand capacitance effect. I'm contemplating rigging up a dial cord arrangement which would make tuning even easier and totally eliminate hand capacitance. We'll see.
Once everything was assembled I checked the SWR. With this capacitor it tunes 30, 40, 20, 17, 12 and 10 meters! As the graphs below show the SWR curves look quite good with a near 1:1 SWR on all bands. No on-air checks since by the time I finished building it, those bands had gone to bed! Maybe in the next couple days I can do some on-air tests, hopefully a QSO or two!
2018-12-22 Overnight I got to thinking about my transformer concept. It struck me that the number of turns of both the "primary" and "secondary" are the same, one turn. That seems more like an isolation transformer than a matching transformer. With a normal transformer if you have the same turns on both the primary and secondary you have very close to the same voltage and current in both! Double the number of turns on the secondary and you have approximately double the voltage on the secondary as primary, etc. But in this case, the only difference is the circumference (or diameter) of the two winding's, and the consequent difference in inductance. How does that "transform" the impedance? After doing quite a bit of reading no one else seems to address this so I'll quit worrying about it!
But I did decide to experiment with small loop circumference using my original single #12 wire loop. My 20 meter data:
- 14" loop, ~75 ohms, 1.0 SWR.
- 17" loop, ~50 ohms, 1.0 SWR. 22" loop, <50 ohms, 1.1 SWR.
- 30" loop, ~11 ohms, 1.5 SWR.
I then decided to do some more careful measuring with my RG8x driving loop. It seems to follow those same behaviors. Overall, I conclude that driving loop dimensions are not super critical. So go with the general guideline of about 1/5th the circumference of the main loop and use whatever material you have available.
After reading the AA5TB article above I have decided to try a different capacitor. He makes the strong point that resistances in the main loop must be kept to an absolute minimum. One of the main sources of resistance are the contacts in a variable capacitor. His suggestion is to use either a butterfly capacitor or just the stater sections of a multi stage capacitor such as used in older broadcast radios. That removes any moveable physical connections from the circuit as the rotor in the latter case simply acts as a series bridge between the two stater's with only capacitance coupling. I know the rotor connection in the current capacitor is very fragile and minimal, unable to handle much current. I've got one that has an almost identical tuning range when used as he suggests, so back to the work bench!
2018-12-21 There are many good YouTube videos on building Mag Loop antennas and I've gotten considerable help from some of them. The one I watched last night (I don't recall which one that was) had an idea the I knew immediately that I needed. One of the problems with the capacitor is the effect of hand capacitance. If you just move your hand near it, the resonance point will change. At least one person rigged up a motor driven capacitor with remote control. Clearly a solution but also a significant complication. The one that caught my attention was a guy who used a several inch plastic extension on the shaft so his had was kept well away from the capacitor when tuning. Today along with a few other changes to dress the thing up a bit I incorporated that. The picture at right shows how I did it. And it works very well!
I didn't have time to actually work anyone today on 20 meters but I heard and tuned several stations. With that extension I was able to tune to lowest SWR quite easily after initially tuning for peak noise.
2018-12-20 Two or 1-1/2 QSOs is hardly solid data to analyze an antenna, but it is exciting, especially when it is with an antenna the likes of which you have never even played with previously in your career. And that is the case with this magnetic loop. To me they always seemed like a joke. But now I am convinced they are a serious antenna. The first qso with NM1I in MA, 800 miles east was on December 18 at 1650z on 14.033. He was initially a solid 559 but faded to unreadable but not before I had gotten everything. He gave me a 339 but I don't think he got my second transmission at all, hence the 1/2 QSO! The second was yesterday at 2037z on 14.057 with W5MIG in Texas, 1000 miles. He gave me a 449 and he was a solid 549 in here. Both were made using my x5105 at 5 watts. That one was interesting because I had just had a QSO with him at 2027z, also with the x5105 at 5 watts but using my G5RV station antenna.
He was 579 in here and gave me a 539 using my G5RV. He didn't know I was going to call again as the thought just hit me when we finished. I have to say I was surprised that he heard me and responded. Thanks to both Butch and Jerry for "making my day!" Both times I had my loop sitting on a bar stool upstairs in our home where I could rotate it easily. I heard W5MIG with the antenna down stairs but very weekly. Those two contacts convinced me this is a viable antenna so I'll be making "improvements" to it and once the weather warms will be playing with it outdoors.
2018-12-19 I think I am closing in on a "final" version of my mag loop! Famous last words. An antenna is never "done!" But this one is about as good as I can make it in its present form. And I'm fairly pleased. I have now had 1-1/2 QSOs with it, both on 20 meters. Both CW. both from our upstairs bedroom! Location wise, I know that is not a permanent location! But the ten or twelve feet higher with open space to rotate it makes a difference, I think.
- Small loop: 21" in circumference (about 8" diameter). RG-8x with the center conductor and shield soldered together at both ends so it will behave like a single of wire approximately 1/4 inch in diameter. Connects to a BNC jack (for the feedline), one end to the center the other end to the outer or ground side of the jack. The small loop measures about 0.6uh.
- Capacitor: Junk box variable with fairly wide plate spacing adjusts from 10pf to 101pf. Resonates the loop on 30, 20 and 17 meters. I may add a way to plug a fixed capacitor externally to allow resonating on 40 meters.
- Capacitor Box: I built the capacitor box from 1/16th inch hobby plywood assembled using balsa corner blocks, cemented together with Insta-Cure CA from HobbyTown.
- Feedline: Four foot piece of RG-174 terminated both ends with a BNC connector.
- It is quite directional with strongest signal in the plane of the loop and fairly deep nulls broadside to the loop.
- SWR is very low at resonance, no tuner is required.
- It can be tuned up on 40 meters as well as 15 meters but the calculator above indicates it will be low efficiency 40 meters.
- Bandwidth is very narrow as the Q is very high which makes tuning tricky. Furthermore hand capacitance is an issue. A larger knob might help with both.
- Most importantly, it does actually work! In good band conditions I can imagine it would work very well. And it was fun to build. Building it took magnetic loops from mystery to reality for me. Like all antennas, it is very simple in both concept and physically. I'm guessing it is not by any means the world's best antenna, but it is clearly an option and one that will work indoors or where antenna supports are a problem.
2018-12-18a After the "success" mentioned below, I found a light weight, ten foot piece of 1/2 inch copper pipe in the garage. It had been under the house in the crawl space for some reason and the builder pulled it out. Suddenly, I have the main ingredient to make a more robust loop. Not sure it will be as portable as I was originally imagining, but it will certainly be overall "better", depending on my building skills! The calculator above says to make it into an octagon I need 8 sections, 1.25 feet each. My first thought was to buy 45 degree elbows but now I'm thinking I can make eight 45 degree bends and avoid needing the elbows and all the soldering involved. We'll see. That will be tomorrow's project. I've got a number of capacitor combinations I can use and I'll start with the small loop I already have although with a ten foot circumference for the main loop it should be 24" rather than 21". Will be interesting to see how big a difference that makes.
2018-12-18 I started today by making a new small loop using 21" of RG-8x, soldering the shield and center conductor together to form a single conductor that is 1/4 diameter. An alternative would have been to use 1/4 copper tubing or something similar. One end of this driving loop is soldered to the shield side of the BNC connector and the other end to the center conductor, forming a single turn loop about 8" in diameter. the feedline connects to the BNC connector.
I just hung the loop on the fastener for the shock cord which was holding the top of my main loop up as shown below. The capacitor is a 14-310pf variable. Once connected I used my x5105 SWR scan function to run a bandwidth scan on 40, 30, 20 and 17 meters which are shown below. It may just be me but it seemed that tuning was much more critical with these larger diameter wire loops than previously. Perhaps that reflects less resistance in the elements so less energy is going to heat and more to radiation?
I noticed a difference immediately when I tuned 40 meters. I heard actual ham SSB transmissions. My "lab" is on the ground floor of the house so I decided to go upstairs to our main bedroom which has a large open space at the foot of the bed. My wife is out shopping right now so please, don't tell her! I again noticed a difference on 40 and tried but couldn't raise anyone. The Mag Loop Calculator above indicates that its efficiency on 40 is very low, about 5% or so I think. But I did notice that it is pretty directional. By rotating it on the bar stool I could see and hear quite a difference in signal strength. I also noticed a distinct noise on the band when "pointing" toward the neighbor's house which almost completely faded when I turned it broadside toward the house. So as indicated in some of the articles I've read it effectively blocks unwanted noise (if the signal you want is about 90 degrees from the noise source.
Just to check to see if there was any activity on 20 meters I tuned up there and almost immediately heard NM1I calling CQ from MA on 14.033. So I tuned the capacitor for that frequency and went back to him. I was so nervous that it took me a while to discover my power was at 0.5 watts and then get everything tuned. But then I gave him a call and to my amazement he came back! Thanks Butch. He gave me a 559 and he was about 339 here but we lost contact as his signal began to fade during his initial transmission, dropping out completely. I never heard him again. But that was enough to light my fire! I'm sure this will not be my final rendition of a small magnetic loop antenna! They actually do work! And I can't say enough about the xiegu x5105 transceiver, especially its SWR sweep function which makes building and tuning antennas a breeze, well almost! Seriously, it does work very well and it's nice to be able to punch the button, see exactly where your antenna is resonant, its SWR at resonance, tweak if necessary and then immediately transmit. No cables to change or anything. Pretty slick.
Another observation is that the signal a few feet from the loop is about twice as strong to the right as it is to the left. and it is even lower broadside to the loop. I've read as much in other places but it is interesting to actually observe it. I used my DIY field strength meter to make the measurements.
2018-12-17 I decided to redo the loop using some Low loss RG-8 coax I purchased years ago from Davis RF, their Bury-Flex Low Loss coax, to use with a 900 mhz FM rig. It is 0.4 in od. The piece I have is 8ft, 9in (106") long with PL259 connectors on each end. I rigged it up with the same capacitor I used below, 16-210pf. The small loop is 10 inches in circumference. I tied the center conductor and shield of the new loop together at both ends to form a single-like conductor. At near full capacitance it shows an SWR of 1.1:1 on 40 meters. on 30 meters it is 1.0:1. 1.6:1 on 20 meters and 2.2:1 on 17 meters.
The article above states that the circumference of the small loop should be about 1/5th the circumference of the main loop which is about 21inches in my case. I tried making the small loop from 75ohm cable TV coax but to my surprise the shield is made of aluminum foil and wire which doesn't solder well!
The question I am contemplating is why the SWR goes up with frequency?
2018-12-10 As I've thought about the magnetic loop antenna it strikes me that it is simply a tuned-secondary RF transformer with an un-tuned primary. The one turn (usually) secondary is high impedance and couples to the "ether" while the one turn primary is roughly 50 ohms and couples to the transmitter. That is similar to the tuned-secondary matching transformer circuit I used with my end fed half wave antenna with the primary difference being that a "radiating element" was attached to the secondary in the case of the end fed half wave whereas no such radiating element is used with the magnetic loop. I guess the secondary itself IS the radiating element.
If that is even close to a valid way to think about it that also helps explain why the conductor size and RF resistance of the secondary is such a big deal as it is in essence in parallel with the impedance of the ether as seen by the secondary. And in a parallel circuit the lowest value is the dominant one and will be the biggest factor in absorbing energy.
For whatever reason around 36 inches seems to be a practical trade-off diameter for the secondary turn in many of the examples I've looked at. So I dug around in my junk box and found an almost perfect length of low loss 3/8 inch coax. When formed into a circle its inductance measures 2uh. My junk box also yielded a 16-210pf variable capacitor with fairly wide spacing between the plates. So my plan is to start my project with those. I haven't decided on what I'll use for the primary yet but am thinking of a piece of old cable TV 75 ohm coax. the references I found indicate it should be 1/5th the circumference of the secondary which is about 20". I'm planning this for use with a QRP transmitter, 5 watts.
2018-12-10a After getting most of my chores for the day done I decided to "build" the main loop. I say build with tongue in cheek as I really kind of hung it together. I wanted to see if it really would resonate near some useful frequency using the 16-210pf variable capacitor.
Rather than using the piece of coax mentioned above I tied all three wires of a 102 inch piece of 12AWG with ground electrical wire together. Then I "hung" the wire on a 40 inch piece of wood attached to a piece of OSB flooring and soldered the ends to the capacitor.
Loop, counter dipper and capacitor setup on left. Center shows the connection to the capacitor. Right shows the home brew dipper.
Finally, using my trusty home brew FET dip meter set to about 14.05 mhz as indicated on my antique frequency counter I tuned the capacitor to see if I could find a dip. I DID! In fact I could tune it all the way from 18mhz down to 6.7mhz. Not sure that is a practical range for use but it does resonate over that range. My experiment is successful! All I need to do now is add a small loop and see if I can get a useful match to a transmitter!
2018-12-10b Well, I quick threw together a loop made of 20 inches of #12 electrical wire and soldered the ends to a BNC connector. Then using tie wraps I attached it alongside the top of the large loop. A quick check indicated that the main loop resonant frequency wasn't affected much so I tuned it to 14.05mhz. Then using a three foot piece of RG-174 coax terminated with BNC connected the small loop to my Xiegu X5105 and ran a SWR scan with it. To my amazement and pleasure the SWR looked just like it should with the lowest point near 1:1 at roughly 14.05mhz! I ran SWR scans for 30 and 40 meters as well and the plots for all of them are below. The concept is proven!
Would it, will it work on the air? I guess that comes next. Then I may build a "nice one" properly! Though I am very pleased with this concept model.